Intent Bridge vs Canonical L2 Bridge
**Intent bridges** (solver networks) promise fast fills and one-click UX. **Canonical bridges** tie security to the L2's official withdrawal path—slower exits but clearer trust assumptions.
Step by step
1. Read settlement time
Fast UI may hide solver inventory or delayed finality.
2. Check failure refunds
Know what happens if the route reverts mid-flight.
3. Prefer canonical for size
Large transfers may favor official bridges despite wait.
Intent vs canonical bridge
Speed trades off against transparent security margins.
- Intent / solver: Fast UX; solver and relayer risk; competitive fees.
- Canonical: Slower L1 exit; rollup-aligned security story.
Use our calculators
Common mistakes
- Bridging max wallet balance without gas on destination
- Using unaudited new routers
FAQ
Are intent bridges non-custodial?
Designs vary—read whether solvers take temporary custody.